• No results found

MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS

2 ATOMS, MOLECULES, AND SOLIDS

2.3 MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS

contribute an electron that they can formnegativeions, stably but weakly binding an extra electron. This even includes H2, the negative hydrogen ion. Hydrogen is in the odd position of having some properties in common with the alkali metals and some in common with the halogens.

The characterization of atomic electron states in terms of the four quantum numbers n,‘,m, andms, together with the Pauli exclusion principle, thus allows us to understand why Na is chemically similar to K, Mg is chemically similar to Ca, and so forth. These chemical periodicities, according to which the periodic table is arranged, are con- sequences of the way electrons fill in the allowed “slots” when they combine with nuclei to form atoms.

Of course, there is a great deal more that can be said about the periodic table. For a rigorous treatment of atomic structure, we must refer the reader to textbooks on atomic physics. As mentioned earlier, however, we can understand lasers without a more detailed understanding of atomic and molecular physics.

force is quantum mechanical; we will not attempt to explain it but will simply accept the result (2.3.1) and consider its consequences.

For simplicity, let us assume that the nuclei can move only in one dimension.

The total energy of a diatomic system (i.e., the sum of kinetic and potential energies) is then

12m1x_12þ12m2x_22þ12k(x2x1x0)2, (2:3:3) where the dots denote differentiation with respect to time, that is,x_ ¼dx=dt. In terms of the reduced mass

m¼m1m2

M , (2:3:4)

whereM¼m1þm2is the total mass, and the center-of-mass coordinate X¼m1x1þm2x2

M , (2:3:5)

we may write (2.3.3) as (Problem 2.2)

12MX_2þ12mx_2þ12k(xx0)2: (2:3:6) The first term is just the kinetic energy associated with the center-of-mass motion. We ignore it and focus our attention on the internal vibrational energy

12mx_2þ12k(xx0)2: (2:3:7) The vibrational motion of a diatomic molecule must clearly be one dimensional, and so we lose nothing in the way of generality by restricting ourselves to one-dimensional vibrations from the start [Eq. (2.3.3)].

The quantum mechanics of the motion associated with the energy formula (2.3.7) has much in common with that for the hydrogen atom electron. The most important result is that the allowed energiesEof the oscillator are also quantized. The quantized

m1 m2 F F F F

x0 x x

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 2.4 (a) When the two nuclei of a diatomic molecule are separated by the equilibrium distance x0, there is no force between them. If their separationxis larger thanx0, there is an attractive force (b), whereas whenxis less thanx0the force is repulsive (c). The internuclear force is approximately harmonic, that is, springlike.

2.3 MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS 27

energies are given by

En¼hv(nþ12), n¼0, 1, 2, 3,. . ., (2:3:8) with

v¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi k=m

p : (2:3:9) This formula is clearly quite different from Bohr’s formula for hydrogen. The quantum mechanical energy spectrum for a harmonic oscillator is simply a ladder of evenly spaced levels separated byhv(Fig. 2.5). The ground level of the oscillator corresponds ton¼0. However, an oscillator in its ground level is not at rest at its stable equilibrium point x¼x0. Even the lowest possible energy of a quantum mechanical oscillator has finite kinetic and potential energy contributions. At zero absolute temperature, where classically all motion ceases, the quantum mechanical oscillator still has a finite energy12hv. For this reason the energy12hv is called the zero-point energy of the harmonic oscillator.

Of course, real diatomic molecules are not perfect harmonic oscillators, and their vibrational energies do not satisfy (2.3.8) precisely. Figure 2.6 shows the sort of potential

E4 = — E

9 2 E3 = —7

2 E2 = — 5

2 E1 = — 3

2 E0 = —1

2 hw hw hw hw hw

Figure 2.5 The energy levels of a harmonic oscillator form a ladder with rung spacinghv.

V(x)

Harmonic oscillator

Real diatomic molecule

x0

x (Internuclear separation)

Figure 2.6 The potential energy function of a real diatomic molecule is approximately like that of a harmonic oscillator for values ofxnearx0.

energy functionV(x) that describes the bonding of a real diatomic molecule. The Taylor series expansion of the functionV(x) about the equilibrium pointx0is

V(x)¼V(x0)þ(xx0) dV dx x¼x

0

þ1

2(xx0)2 d2V dx2

x¼x0

þ1

6(xx0)3 d3V dx3

x¼x0

þ : (2:3:10)

HereV(x0) is a constant, which we put equal to zero by shifting the origin of the energy scale. Also (dV/dx)x¼x0¼0 because, by definition,x¼x0is the equilibrium separation, at which the potential energy is a minimum. Furthermore (d2V/dx2) atx¼x0is positive ifx0is a point of stable equilibrium (Fig. 2.6). Thus, we can replace (2.3.10) by

V(x)¼12k(xx0)2þA(xx0)3þB(xx0)4þ , (2:3:11) whereA,B,. . .are constants andk¼(d2V=dx2)x¼x0.

From (2.3.10) we can conclude thatanypotential energy function describing a stable equilibrium [i.e., (dV=dx)x¼x0 ¼0, (d2V=dx2)x¼x0 .0] can be approximated by the harmonic oscillator potential (2.3.1) for small enough displacements from equilibrium.

Of course, what is “small” is determined by the constantsA,B,. . .in (2.3.11), that is, by the shape of the potential function V(x). If the terms involving third and/or higher powers of x 2x0in (2.3.11) are not negligible, however, we have what is called an anharmonic potential. The energy levels of an anharmonic oscillator do not satisfy the simple formula (2.3.8).

Real diatomic molecules have vibrational spectra that are usually only slightly anhar- monic. In conventional notation the vibrational energy levels of diatomic molecules are written in the form

Ev¼hcve vþ12

xe122

þye123

h þ i

, (2:3:12) where

v¼0, 1, 2, 3,. . ., (2:3:13)

andveis in units of “wave numbers,” i.e., cm21;cveis the same asv/2p¼nin this notation. If the anharmonicity coefficientsxe,ye,. . .are all zero, we recover the harmonic oscillator spectrum (2.3.8). Numerical values ofve,xe,ye,. . .are tabulated in the litera- ture.4Values ofve,xe,ye,. . .are given for several diatomic molecules in Table 2.1. The deviations from perfect harmonicity are small untilvbecomes large, that is, until we climb fairly high up the vibrational ladder. The level spacing decreases asvincreases, in contrast to the even spacing of the ideal harmonic oscillator (Fig. 2.7).

4A standard source is G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. Volume I, Spectra of Diatomic Molecules, Robert E. Krieger, Malabar, FL, 1989.

2.3 MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS 29

† For a simple check on our theory, consider the two molecules hydrogen fluoride (HF) and deuterium fluoride (DF). These molecules differ only to the extent that D has a neutron and a proton in its nucleus and H has only a proton. Since neutrons have no effect on molecular bond- ing, we expect HF and DF to have the same potential functionV(x) and therefore the same “spring constant”k. According to (2.3.9), therefore, we should have

vHFe

vDFe ¼ mDF mHF 1=2

, (2:3:14)

wheremDFandmHFare thereducedmasses of DF and HF, respectively, so that mDF

mHF¼ mDmF mDþmF

mHmF

mHþmF(2)(19)

2þ191þ19

(1)(19)1:90: (2:3:15) From the value ofvefor HF given in Table 2.1, therefore, we calculate

vDFe (4138:52)(1:90)1=2¼2998:64 cm1, (2:3:16) and indeed this is very close to the tabulated valueve¼2998.25 cm21for DF.4

Regarding the zero-point energy of molecular vibrations, consider a transition in which there is a change in both the electronic (e) and the vibrational (v) states of a diatomic molecule.

E

Ev+1 Ev Ev–1

Figure 2.7 The vibrational energy level spacing of a real (anharmonic) diatomic molecule decreases with increasing vibrational energy.

TABLE 2.1 Vibrational Constants of the Ground Electronic State for a Few Diatomic Molecules

Molecule ve(cm21) xe ye

H2 4395.24 0.0268 6.671025

O2 1580.36 0.00764 3.461025

CO 2170.21 0.00620 1.421025

HF 4138.52 0.0218 2.371024

HCl 2989.74 0.0174 1.871025

The transition energy is approximately

DEe0v0,ev¼Ee0Eeþhc ve0v0þ12

ve12

, (2:3:17)

where the unprimed and primed labels refer to the initial and final states, respectively, andveand ve0are the vibrational constants associated with the two electronic states. Now suppose that one of the nuclei of the diatomic molecule is replaced by a different isotope, for example, HF is replaced by DF. The electronic energy levels are approximately unchanged by this replacement, but the vibrational constantsveandve0are changed torveandrve0, whereris the square root of the ratio of reduced masses of the two molecules, as in our example above comparing HF and DF.

For the second, isotopically different molecule, then, the transition energy (2.3.17) is replaced by DEei0v0,ev¼Ee0Eeþhc rve0v0þ12

rve12

: (2:3:18)

The vibrational spectra of the two isotopic molecules for the same electronic transitionEe!Ee0

therefore differ by

DEie0v0,evDEe0v0,ev¼hc(r1) ve0v0þ12

ve12

, (2:3:19) and in particular, forv¼0!v0¼0,

DEie00,e0DEe00,e0¼12hc(r1)(ve0ve): (2:3:20) This is nonzero because of zero-point energy, that is, it would vanish if the energy levels of a harmonic oscillator were given byEn¼nhv instead of En¼(nþ12)hv. The zero-point energy of molecular vibrations was confirmed in this way by R. S. Mulliken (1924), who compared the observed vibrational spectra of B10O16and B11O16. This was before the quantum mechanical derivation by Heisenberg (1925) of the formula (2.3.8) for the energy

levels of a harmonic oscillator. †