2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee

(1)

2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee

Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and Secretary of Health and Human Services

First Print : July 2020

This is the first print of the Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee and is being provided to the public online. The report will be formatted for publication and available in hard copy later this year.

Online-only supplementary materials for data analysis, food pattern modeling, and NESR systematic reviews can be found through DietaryGuidelines.gov.

Suggested citation: Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2020. Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.

U.S. Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20250

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20201

(2)

USDA of derivative products developed from this work may not be stated or implied.

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and USDA civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail:

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3)

email: program.intake@usda.gov.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

(3)

completed its review of topics and questions requested by the Departments of Agriculture and of Health and Human Services and is submitting the attached report for use in preparing the 2020- 2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The work of the Committee has been guided by the Federal Advisory Committee Act as well as recent changes in the process to develop the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. In part, improvements in developing the Committee's report were implemented in response to the 2017 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and

Medicine (NASEM) report, Redesigning the Process for Establishing the Dietary Guidelines, to make the process more transparent, inclusive, and science-driven. In addition, the Agricultural Act of 2014 mandates the inclusion of infants and toddlers and women who are pregnant or lactating in the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. As a result, this edition will cover the full lifespan.

The Committee's report emphasizes 2 major themes that can inform the development of the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans:

•

The importance of considering life stage in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans o These life stages include pregnancy, lactation, birth to age 24 months, childhood,

adolescence, and adulthood.

o Special nutrition considerations exist at each life stage, and improvements in

recommended food patterns at each stage have the potential to influence healthy food choices at the next life stage.

•

Dietary patterns provide a framework for the Dietary Guidelines for Americans within and across life stages

o Healthy dietary patterns are defined by the quality of foods that are included, as well as foods that should be limited.

o A high-quality dietary pattern can promote health, achieve nutrient adequacy and energy balance, and reduce the risk of diet-related chronic diseases.

o The evidence on specific dietary components (e.g., beverages, seafood, added sugars, dietary fats, macronutrient profile) consistently supports the importance of foods consumed in healthy dietary patterns as a framework for the Guidelines.

(5)

dietary patterns in which typical food choices result in excess energy intake and inadequate nutritional quality. The Committee's work culminated in the development of this report, which summarizes the Committee's review of nearly 1,500 primary research articles included in

original NESR systematic reviews, 16 existing NESR systematic reviews, more than 50 analyses of Federal data sets, and numerous food pattern modeling analyses that represented, for the first time, the entire lifespan. In addition, the Committee relied on evidence from the 2015

Committee report and the NASEM Dietary Reference Intake recommendations. To complete its tasks, the Committee worked in subcommittees, and their protocols, conclusions, and

recommendations were brought forward for full Committee discussion in public meetings. Work on the questions was prioritized to enable the Committee to provide advice that is most relevant to the charge in the Committee's charter. In addition, the work of the Committee was posted on the Dietary Guidelines website in draft form as it evolved, to facilitate transparency and

opportunities for public comment. An additional strength of the current process is that all of the systematic reviews that provided the evidence considered by the Committee underwent peer review before inclusion in the full report.

The Committee began its work in March 2019. As the 2020 Committee submits its report and the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans are prepared, we are in the midst of the COVID-19 epidemic. As more is learned about infection by SARS-Co V-2 and the development of COVID- 19, it is clear that it has significant nutritional implications. These parallel epidemics, one non

infectious ( obesity and diet-related chronic diseases) and one infectious (COVID-19), appear to be synergistic. Those at most risk for the most serious outcomes of COVID-19, including hospitalization and death, are people afflicted by diet-related chronic diseases ( obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease). Finally, throughout the world, the consequences of physical isolation and financial disruption by the threat of COVID-19 infection has led to significant increases in food insecurity and hunger, further increasing susceptibility to both infectious and diet-related chronic diseases. Thus, these inten-elationships between chronic diseases, COVID-19, and social determinants of health, emphasize the critical importance of improving dietary patterns. These parallel epidemics demonstrate the central role of nutrition and healthy dietary patterns in susceptibility to both infections and diet-related chronic diseases and these relationships should be further examined in future dietary guidelines.

The public comments received by the Committee provided useful insights as the Committee developed its protocols for examining the relevant evidence. However, many comments

. identified areas that were beyond the scope of the Committee's charge. For example, comments identified the need to evaluate dietary patterns that are effective in the management, support, and treatment of those with chronic diseases and disabilities to determine their value in clinical practice. In addition, comments identified the importance of evaluating sustainability of recommended dietary patterns, addressing the social and economic aspects of access to foods that are components of healthy dietary patterns, and considering systemic changes to encourage behavior change consistent with the guidelines. These comments point to areas that are important for USDA and HHS to address through appropriate mechanisms, and their consideration may provide useful approaches for implementing the recommendations in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

(6)

grading the evidence, and drafting conclusions and recommendations that are a part of each chapter. However, our work would not have been possible without the diligent and careful work of the staff to assemble all of the information needed for these reviews and evaluations. It is hard to put into words the scope of the work and the outstanding quality of the staffs contributions to the process, other than to simply state that the Committee could not have done its work without this support. The Committee also benefitted from the peer review process organized by USDA's Agricultural Research Service. These reviews provided useful feedback on the systematic reviews and we appreciate the input from the Federal scientists who participated.

The National Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Act of 1990 mandates that the

Secretaries of USDA and HHS review and release the Dietary Guidelines for Americans at least every 5 years so that they reflect "the preponderance of scientific and medical knowledge that is current at the time the report is prepared." We believe that this report accomplishes this goal. As chair and vice-chair of the Committee, we are grateful to our fellow Committee members for their incredible commitment to the work of this Committee, even as their work environments changed due to the COVID-19 epidemic. Each member's expertise brought a unique and essential contribution to the report. The members have analyzed large volumes of material, synthesized it into conclusions and recommendations, and placed our findings in context to illustrate how our assessment can be used in the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

By exhibiting respect for the opinions of their fellow Committee members, evaluating public comments, providing constructive suggestions on drafts, and keeping the focus on the scientific evidence, the members have developed a report that reflects the analysis and advice of the Committee as a whole. It has been a pleasure to work with, and learn from, the entire group.

We look forward to seeing the contributions of our Committee incorporated into the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

Sincerely,

Barbara Schneeman, PhD Chair

(7)

DIETARY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND FEDERAL SUPPORT STAFF

2020 DIETARY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

Chair

Barbara Schneeman, PhD University of California, Davis

Vice Chair

Ronald Kleinman, MD

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School

Members

Jamy Ard, MD

Wake Forest School of Medicine

Richard Mattes, PhD, MPH, RD Purdue University

Regan Bailey, PhD, MPH, RD Purdue University

Elizabeth Mayer-Davis, PhD, RD

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Lydia Bazzano, MD, PhD

Tulane University and Ochsner Health System

Timothy Naimi, MD, MPH Boston University

Carol Boushey, PhD, MPH, RD University of Hawaii

Rachel Novotny, PhD, RDN, LD University of Hawaii

Teresa Davis, PhD

Baylor College of Medicine

Joan Sabaté, MD, DrPH Loma Linda University

Kathryn Dewey, PhD

University of California, Davis

Linda Snetselaar, PhD, RDN University of Iowa

Sharon Donovan, PhD, RD

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Jamie Stang, PhD, MPH, RD University of Minnesota

Steven Heymsfield, MD

Louisiana State University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Elsie Taveras, MD, MPH

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Heather Leidy, PhD

University of Texas at Austin

Linda Van Horn, PhD, RDN, LD Northwestern University

(8)

FEDERAL SUPPORT STAFF

Co-Executive Secretaries

Eve Essery Stoody, PhD Designated Federal Officer Co-Executive Secretary

Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion Food and Nutrition Service

Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services USDA

David Klurfeld, PhD

Coordinator of Peer Review of NESR Systematic Reviews

Co-Executive Secretary Agricultural Research Service

Research, Education, and Economics USDA

Lead Administrative Support

Janet de Jesus, MS, RD Division of Prevention Science

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

HHS

Richard Olson, MD, MPH Division of Prevention Science

HHS

Colette Rihane, MS, RD (Through October 2019)

Policy Officials

Jackie Haven, MS, RD Deputy Administrator

Don Wright, MD, MPH (Through March 2020)

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health Director

HHS

(9)

USDA and HHS Federal Liaisons

Meghan Adler, MS, RD

Office of Nutrition Guidance and Analysis Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion USDA

Cria Perrine, PhD

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HHS

Jean Altman, MS

Julia Quam, MSPH, RDN Division of Prevention Science

HHS Clarissa (Claire) Brown, MS, MPH, RD

Elizabeth Rahavi, RD

Kellie O. Casavale, PhD, RD

Office of Nutrition and Food Labeling Food and Drug Administration HHS

Kelley Scanlon, PhD, RD

Special Nutrition Research and Analysis Division

Office of Policy Support USDA

Jennifer Lerman, MPH, RD National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health HHS

Jennifer Seymour, PhD

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity

Rebecca MacIsaac, MS, RD Division of Prevention Science

HHS

Ashley Vargas, PhD, MPH, RDN, FAND Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

National Institutes of Health HHS

(10)

Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Team

Julie Obbagy, PhD, RD Project Lead

Emily Callahan, MS

Emily Madan, PhD Panum Group¹

Joanne Spahn, MS, RD

Julie Nevins, PhD Panum Group¹

Charlotte Bahnfleth, PhD Panum Group¹

Kripa Raghavan, DrPh, MPH, MSc Panum Group¹

Marlana Bates, MPH, RD Panum Group¹

Sara Scinto-Madonich, MS Panum Group¹

Natasha Cole, PhD, MPH, RD Panum Group¹

Maureen Spill, PhD Panum Group¹ Laural Kelly English, PhD

Panum Group¹

Sudha Venkatramanan, PhD, MSc Panum Group¹

Darcy Gungor, MS Panum Group¹

Gisela Butera, MLIS, MEd Panum Group¹

Julia H. Kim, PhD, MPH, RD Panum Group¹

Nancy Terry, MS, MLS

National Institutes of Health Library Brittany Kingshipp, PhD

Panum Group¹

1 Under contract with the Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

(11)

Data Analysis Team

TusaRebecca Pannucci, PhD, MPH, RD Team Lead

Namanjeet Ahluwalia, PhD, DSc, FACN National Center for Health Statistics

Melissa Nickle, MS

Food Surveys Research Group Agricultural Research Service USDA

Jaspreet Ahuja, MS

Methods and Application of Food Composition Laboratory

Agricultural Research Service USDA

Lauren O’Conner, PhD, MPH National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health HHS

Joseph Goldman, MA

Food Surveys Research Group Agricultural Research Service USDA

Cynthia Ogden, PhD, MRP

National Center for Health Statistics

Heather C. Hamner, PhD, MS, MPH

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HHS

Jill Reedy, PhD, MPH, RD National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health HHS

Kirsten Herrick, PhD, MSc National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health HHS

Donna Rhodes, MS, RD Food Surveys Research Group Agricultural Research Service USDA

Hazel Hiza, PhD, RD

Marissa Shams-White, PhD, MS, MPH National Cancer Institute

National Institutes of Health HHS

Kristin Koegel, MBA, RD²

Cheyenne Swanson, MS (Through February 2020) Panum Group¹

Kevin Kuczynski, MS, RD²

Edwina Wambogo, PhD, MPH, RD Office of Dietary Supplements National Institutes of Health HHS

Alanna Moshfegh, MS, RD Food Surveys Research Group Agricultural Research Service USDA

1 Under contract with the Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

2 Supported food pattern modeling analyses.

(12)

Additional Staff Support

Frances Bevington, MA

HHS

Jessica Larson, MS, RD

Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion USDA

Stephenie Fu

Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion USDA

Holly McPeak, MS

HHS

Science Writer/Editor

Anne Brown Rodgers Panum Group¹

1Under contract with the Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

(13)

PART A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Departments of Agriculture and of Health and Human Services established the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee for the single, time-limited task of examining the evidence on specific nutrition and public health topics and providing independent, science- based advice to the Federal government as the Departments develop the next edition of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The 2020 Committee used 3 approaches to examine the evidence: data analysis, food pattern modeling, and NESR systematic reviews. Each of these approaches has its own rigorous, protocol-driven methodology, and played a unique,

complementary role in examining the science. For the first time, the USDA and HHS identified topics and scientific questions to be examined by the 2020 Committee before establishing the Committee. The type of information the Committee needed to answer each scientific question determined which approach they would use to review the evidence (see Part C. Methodology for more information on the Committee’s evidence review process).

As was true for the 2010 and 2015 Committees, the 2020 Committee’s work took place against a backdrop of several significant nutrition-related issues in the United States.

 More than 70 percent of Americans have overweight or obesity, and the prevalence of severe obesity has increased over the past 2 decades. The increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity at young ages is of particular concern because of their effects on the current health of the child as well as the risks of persistent overweight or obesity into adulthood.

 The high rates of overweight and obesity are an important public health problem in and of themselves, and they are a driver for prevalent diet-related chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes, and some types of cancer. At present, 6 in 10 Americans have a chronic condition and 4 in 10 Americans have 2 or more chronic conditions. Various factors contribute to the prevalence of these chronic diseases.

Prominent among these are unhealthy dietary patterns and a lack of physical activity.

 Food insecurity and lack of access to affordable healthy food is a persistent problem. In 2018, more than 37 million people, including 6 million children, lived in households that were uncertain of having, or unable to acquire, enough food to meet their needs. Certain populations are disproportionately affected, including low-income, Black non-Hispanic, and Hispanic households, households with young children, and households headed by a single woman or man.

(14)

The 2020 Committee’s report responds to this backdrop with 2 distinguishing features. The first feature is the lifespan approach the Committee took in its review of evidence. This report continues the traditional emphasis on individuals ages 2 years and older and, for the first time, expands upon it to reflect the growing body of evidence about appropriate nutrition during the earliest stages of life. The Committee reviewed the period from birth to age 24 months and also conducted a review of diet and health issues in pregnancy and lactation. The findings confirm that a healthy diet during these life stages is essential to support healthy growth and

development during infancy and childhood and to promote health and prevent chronic disease through childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. The Committee’s review and conclusions will enable USDA and HHS to take a full lifespan approach in the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

The second feature is the Committee’s focus on dietary patterns, which began with the 2010 Committee and was continued by the 2015 Committee. The 2020 Committee built on this work and has made dietary patterns a centerpiece of its report. This emphasis acknowledges the reality that people do not consume nutrients or foods in isolation but in various combinations over time. It also reflects growing evidence that components of a dietary pattern may have interactive, synergistic, and potentially cumulative relationships that can predict overall health status and disease risk more fully than can individual foods or nutrients.

The remainder of this Executive Summary provides brief summaries of the Committee’s topic-specific evidence reviews. Each of these reviews also generated recommendations for research to fill gaps in the current evidence (see Part E. Future Directions for a compilation of these recommendations). The Committee’s report also includes a chapter, summarized here, that integrates its findings and conclusions on a lifespan approach to healthy dietary patterns.

CURRENT DIETARY INTAKES THROUGH THE LIFE COURSE

Diet is a modifiable factor that is critically relevant to the primary and secondary prevention of most non-communicable diseases and the leading causes of disability and death affecting Americans. Consistent and well-conducted Federal monitoring and surveillance have shown that most Americans have 1 or more chronic diet-related health conditions, including overweight and obesity, heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, liver disease, certain types of cancer, dental caries, and/or metabolic syndrome. The Committee’s review of current dietary intakes shows that the American dietary landscape has not changed appreciably over time.

Across the lifespan, the typical diet Americans consume result in overconsumption of total

(15)

energy, saturated fats, sodium, added sugars, and for some consumers, alcoholic beverages.

Intakes of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are lower than current recommendations. After early childhood, dairy intakes decrease over the life course, except for a small uptick in older adults. Though the diets of women who are pregnant or lactating are higher in key food groups, they still fall below recommendations. These trends in food intake have ramifications for nutrient intakes and status throughout life. For Americans ages 1 year and older, dietary intake

distributions, along with biological endpoints, clinical indicators, and prevalence of health conditions measured through validated surrogate markers, suggest that current

underconsumption of vitamin D, calcium, dietary fiber, and potassium is of public health

concern. Similarly, patterns of food group intakes across the life course contribute to higher than recommended intakes of food components of public health concern, such as added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat.

Each individual life stage holds unique implications for dietary intake and the risk of disease.

In terms of life stages, while young infants appear to be generally well-nourished, some gaps exist. The risk of chronic disease begins early in life, with important health consequences for the fetus based on the dietary intake of the mother and subsequent feeding behaviors in infancy and early childhood. Early life nutritional exposures have emerged as an etiological risk factor associated with later-life chronic disease risk. Diet quality is higher in young children but tends to decline with age throughout childhood and into adolescence. The poor diets of adolescent females are quite concerning, both at the individual level and for the potential intergenerational impacts. The nutritional quality of the diet improves somewhat for older adults, though several specific nutrient concerns remain.

Within each life stage, opportunities exist to provide specific advice to individuals about food components that provide key nutrients at that life stage and for ways they can make healthy food choices. Opportunities also exist to think about healthy food intake patterns that should be carried forward into the next stage of life. This approach recognizes that although nutrient needs vary over the lifespan, early food preferences influence later food choices.

DIET AND HEALTH RELATIONSHIPS: PREGNANCY AND LACTATION

Pregnancy and lactation are a crucial period of life for mothers and infants. Although this time can be viewed as discreet stages in the lifespan with distinct nutritional needs, their outcomes are influenced by the woman’s health status before pregnancy and they can, in turn,

(16)

influence her and her child’s future health trajectory. These cross-cutting influences highlight the potential for long-term benefits to be gained from improving nutrition during pregnancy and lactation.

Pregnancy

The Committee examined relationships between aspects of maternal diet during pregnancy and infant perinatal outcomes. It also examined longer-term child outcomes, including

neurodevelopment and the risk of food allergies and atopic allergic diseases. Evidence

suggests that consuming foods within healthy dietary patterns before and/or during pregnancy may modestly reduce the risk of gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and preterm birth. The components of these beneficial dietary patterns are the same as the dietary components associated with overall chronic disease risk reduction. The Committee’s reviews also suggested that seafood intake before pregnancy as part of a healthy dietary pattern, particularly intake of fish high in omega-3 fatty acids, may be related to reduced risk of

gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders, and that consumption during pregnancy may be related to reduced risk of hypertensive disorders and preterm birth and better cognitive development and language and communication development in children. Therefore, the Committee concurred with existing recommendations that women who are pregnant should consume at least 8 and up to 12 ounces of a variety of seafood per week from choices that are lower in methlymercury and higher in omega-3 fatty acids. Consumption of common allergenic foods, such as eggs and cow milk, during pregnancy did not appear to be associated with an increased risk of food allergies, asthma, and related atopic disease outcomes in the child, nor is the restriction of these foods associated with a decreased risk of these conditions. Folic acid supplementation is associated with better maternal folate status during pregnancy. It also may reduce the risk of hypertensive disorders among women at high-risk or with a previous history of these disorders. Limited evidence suggests that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation during pregnancy can result in favorable cognitive development in children.

Lactation

Nutrient requirements during lactation are intended to support the nutritional status of the mother and to provide the additional amounts of energy and nutrients associated with milk synthesis and the secretion of nutrients into human milk. Due to a lack of evidence, the

Committee was unable to draw conclusions regarding maternal dietary patterns or frequency of

(17)

eating during lactation and postpartum weight loss. However, the Committee’s review suggested that seafood choices are important components of a healthy dietary pattern for women. Therefore, the Committee concurred with existing recommendations that women who are lactating should continue to consume seafood at the same amounts recommended during pregnancy. Because of insufficient evidence, the Committee was unable to draw conclusions about relationships between dietary patterns during lactation and infant developmental outcomes, between supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids and infant developmental outcomes, or between dietary patterns or consumption or avoidance of specific foods and food allergy, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis or asthma. Moderate evidence did indicate that in women who are lactating, consuming folic acid supplements resulted in higher serum and red blood cell folate concentrations, but no difference in human milk folate concentrations,

compared to non-supplement users. Despite the importance of the topics examined for the long- term health of the child, the available evidence for many questions was insufficient to form conclusion statements, highlighting the critical need for additional research.

DIET AND HEALTH RELATIONSHIPS: BIRTH TO AGE 24 MONTHS

Nutritional exposures during the first 1,000 days of life not only contribute to long-term health but also help shape taste preferences and food choices. Human milk or infant formula are the young infant’s primary sustenance until about age 6 months, when the introduction of complementary foods and beverages (CFB) is recommended. The complementary feeding period typically continues to age 24 months as the child transitions fully to family foods. The Committee examined relationships between nutrition and health outcomes for several topics important to this life stage, including exclusive human milk and/or infant formula, CFB, and dietary supplementation with iron or vitamin D.

Exclusive Human Milk and/or Infant Formula Feeding

The Committee examined how various exposures to human milk and/or infant formula are linked to selected outcomes in offspring. The strongest evidence found was that ever being breastfed may reduce the risk of overweight or obesity, type 1 diabetes, and asthma, compared to never being breastfed. Evidence also suggested that a longer duration of any breastfeeding is associated with lower risk of type 1 diabetes and asthma, although the optimal duration of breastfeeding with respect to these outcomes is not well understood. Exclusivity of

(18)

breastfeeding also was found to be associated with a lower risk of type 1 diabetes. This evidence supports existing American Academy of Pediatrics and World Health Organization recommendations for breastfeeding in the United States and globally. The Committee also investigated associations between infant milk-feeding practices and nutrient status of the infant, including for iron, zinc, iodine, vitamin B12, vitamin D, and fatty acids. For most of these

questions, the evidence was scant or nonexistent, which prevented conclusions from being drawn. However, evidence does suggest that human milk feeding may be related to infant fatty acid status, depending on maternal diet. The Committee therefore supports recommendations for women who are lactating to consume food sources of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as fish. Despite the importance of the topics examined for the long-term health of the child, the available evidence for many questions was insufficient to form conclusion statements, highlighting the critical need for additional research.

Complementary Foods and Beverages

The Committee examined the relationship of the timing of introduction of, and types of, CFB on the child’s nutritional status, growth and body composition, neurocognitive development, bone health, and risk of food allergies and atopic diseases. The reviews confirmed existing guidelines that CFBs should not be introduced to infants before age 4 months, and the Committee found that introduction at age 4 to 5 months, as compared to 6 months, does not offer long-term advantages or disadvantages with respect to the outcomes reviewed. The

reviews also support guidance to provide foods that are rich in iron and zinc during the second 6 months of life among breastfed infants, and the need to provide CFBs that contain adequate amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids. The Committee’s review indicated that introducing peanut and egg, in an age appropriate form, in the first year of life (after age 4 months) may reduce the risk of food allergy to these foods. The evidence for such protective effects is less clear for other types of foods, but the Committee found no evidence that avoiding such foods in the first year of life is beneficial with regard to preventing food allergies or other atopic diseases.

Avoiding consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) by children younger than age 2 years is important for several reasons. First, the energy contributed by such beverages leaves less “room” for energy from nutritious CFBs, leading to potential nutrient gaps. Second, limited evidence suggests that SSB consumption by infants and young children is related to

subsequent risk of child overweight. Lastly, intake of SSB in early life may set the stage for greater intake of SSB later in life, with potentially adverse health consequences.

(19)

Dietary Supplements

The Committee’s examination of evidence on the relationships of supplemental iron to growth, size, and body composition showed no positive effects, and possibly negative effects, on growth when iron supplements were given to breastfed infants younger than age 9 months, compared with infants not given iron or given a placebo. However, for iron-deficient children, providing sufficient iron (from foods, supplements, or fortified foods) is important for reducing iron-deficiency anemia and its consequences, including impaired neurobehavioral development.

The Committee’s review of vitamin D and bone health in infancy or early childhood showed little to no statistically significant differences in bone health indicators based on doses of vitamin D supplementation greater than 400 IU. Thus, at this time, the existing body of evidence does not provide a basis for recommending vitamin D supplementation above 400 IU per day during infancy (the current American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation).

USDA Food Patterns for Children Younger than Age 24 Months

Establishing healthy dietary patterns in early childhood is crucial to support immediate needs for growth and development and to promote lifelong health. In keeping with the Departments’

mandate to include dietary recommendations for infants and toddlers in the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, the 2020 Committee explored the possibility of creating USDA Food Patterns for the 6 month to 24 month age range. Using the USDA Food Patterns for individuals ages 2 years and older as a starting point, the Committee modeled several scenarios that incorporated the potential contribution from human milk or infant formula and reflected the total energy needs at ages 6 to 12 months and 12 to 24 months. The Committee was not able to establish a recommended food pattern for infants ages 6 to 12 months but was able to develop potential combinations of CFB that come close to meeting all nutrient needs. The Committee encourages further work to explore options for meeting all nutrient recommendations during that age range. For toddlers ages 12 to 24 months who are fed neither human milk nor infant

formula, the Committee was able to establish a recommended Food Pattern. The Pattern allows for a variety of nutrient-rich animal-source foods, including meat, poultry, seafood, eggs, and dairy products, as well as nuts and seeds, fruits, vegetables, and grain products, prepared in ways that are developmentally appropriate for this age. Key aspects to emphasize include choosing potassium-rich fruits and vegetables, prioritizing seafood, making whole grains the predominant type of grains offered, and choosing oils over solid fats. A Pattern also was

(20)

established for toddlers ages 12 to 24 months who are fed lacto-ovo vegetarian diets and neither human milk nor infant formula.

Because nutrient needs are high relative to energy requirements for children ages 6 to 24 months, and the amounts of CFB that can be consumed are relatively low, especially at the younger ages, it was challenging to develop these Food Patterns. The modeling exercises revealed the importance of prioritizing nutrient-rich food groups and making careful food choices within food groups. Like the USDA Food Patterns for those ages 2 years and older, a strength of the Patterns for younger children is that they provide examples of amounts of food groups and subgroups that can be consumed, but do not dictate specific types of foods. This gives families substantial flexibility to accommodate cultural preferences and cost considerations, and

provides opportunities to introduce children to a wide variety of healthy foods that are important in shaping healthy dietary patterns.

DIET AND HEALTH RELATIONSHIPS: INDIVIDUALS AGES 2 YEARS AND OLDER

The Committee examined a number of topics related to dietary intakes by those ages 2 years and older, including the relationship between overall dietary patterns and 8 broad health outcomes and the relationships of specific aspects of “what” and “how” people eat to various health outcomes.

Dietary Patterns

People eat foods and drink beverages for many reasons, including, but certainly not limited to, nourishment. The quantities, proportions, variety or combination of different foods, drinks, and nutrients in diets and the frequency with which they are habitually consumed, constitute dietary patterns. The Committee found consistent evidence that certain dietary pattern

components are associated with beneficial outcomes for all-cause mortality, CVD, overweight and obesity, type 2 diabetes, bone health, cancer (breast, colorectal, and lung), and

neurocognitive health. Common characteristics of dietary patterns associated with positive health outcomes include higher intake of vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, low- or non- fat dairy, lean meat and poultry, seafood, nuts, and unsaturated vegetable oils and low

consumption of red and processed meats, sugar-sweetened foods and drinks, and refined grains. In addition, the Committee found that negative (detrimental) health outcomes were

(21)

associated with dietary patterns characterized by higher intake of red and processed meats, sugar-sweetened foods and beverages, and refined grains.

Collectively, these observations have major implications for recommending dietary patterns to the U.S. population. The healthy patterns the Committee examined in its review comprised various combinations of foods and were identified with many different names (e.g., DASH, Mediterranean). This suggests that a healthy diet that promotes optimum growth and

development while minimizing risk factors for chronic diseases can be created and tailored to suit cost considerations and a wide variety of personal and cultural preferences.

Dietary Fats and Seafood

Fats are an important component of the American diet, contributing about one-third of the total calories consumed after infancy. The types and food sources of fats consumed have distinct metabolic and health effects. The Committee’s review found that reducing saturated fat intake by replacing it with unsaturated fats, particularly polyunsaturated fat, lowers the incidence of CVD in adults. Replacing saturated with unsaturated fats in the diet also reduces serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in all adults and some children, especially boys.

However, the benefits of replacing saturated fat with carbohydrates are less clear. In addition, because dietary cholesterol is found only in animal-source foods that are typically also sources of saturated fat, the independent effects of dietary cholesterol on CVD are difficult to assess.

The recommended shift from saturated to unsaturated fats occurs best within the context of a healthy dietary pattern consisting of higher intakes of vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts and seeds, with some vegetable oils, low-fat dairy, lean meat and poultry, and fatty fish and lower intakes of red and processed meats, sugar-sweetened foods and drinks, and refined grains.

The Committee also conducted a review of relationships between seafood consumption during childhood and adolescence and risk of CVD and neurocognitive outcomes during the lifespan. Available evidence was insufficient to make a conclusion about seafood intakes during these life stages and risk of later CVD or neurocognitive outcomes. However, no adverse associations were reported.

Beverages

Beverages are broadly defined as any type of energy or non-energy-yielding drink. They contribute substantially to the dietary patterns of Americans in both favorable and adverse ways.

(22)

The Committee reviewed available data on the relationships between beverage consumption and achieving nutrient and food group recommendations. It also examined evidence on the relationship between beverage consumption and growth, size, body composition, and risk of overweight and obesity for children and adults. All beverages contribute to hydration needs, and many beverages, such as milk and 100% juice, can help people attain recommended nutrient intake goals. Other beverages, such as SSB, provide energy but contribute very little toward meeting nutrient and food group recommendations. Sweetened beverages, not including coffee and tea with added sugar, account for approximately one-third of total beverage consumption and contribute approximately 30 percent, 50 percent, and 60 percent of added sugars to the diet of young children, adolescents, and adults, respectively. Among the beverages examined, only SSB intake was associated with adiposity, and this was true for both children and adults.

Because of their low nutrient to energy content ratio and the high prevalence of overweight and obesity in the population, it is important to continue encouraging only limited intake of SSB.

Limited evidence suggests that low- or no-calorie sweetened beverage consumption is associated with reduced adiposity in adults. The evidence was insufficient to evaluate the effects of SSB compared to low- or no-calorie sweetened beverage in children.

Alcoholic Beverages

The majority of U.S. adults consume alcoholic beverages, though not consuming alcohol also is a preference for many Americans. Alcohol consumption and binge drinking are

increasing in the United States, and excessive alcohol consumption is a leading behavioral risk factor for a variety of morbidity and mortality outcomes, social harms, and economic costs.

Aside from energy, alcohol has little nutritional value. Binge drinking is consistently associated with increased risk compared to not binge drinking, and more frequent binge drinking is associated with increased risk compared to less binge drinking. Similarly, among those who drink, consuming higher average amounts of alcohol is associated with increased mortality risk compared to drinking lower average amounts. The Committee concurred with the

recommendation of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans that those who do not drink should not begin to drink because they believe alcohol would make them healthier. Although alcohol can be consumed at low levels with relatively low risk, for those who choose to consume alcohol, evidence points to a general rule that drinking less is better for health than drinking more. Therefore, the focus should remain on reducing consumption among those who drink, particularly among those who drink in ways that increase the risk of harms. The Committee concluded that no evidence exists to relax current Dietary Guidelines for Americans

(23)

recommendations, and there is evidence to tighten them for men such that recommended limits for both men and women who drink would be 1 drink per day on days when alcohol is

consumed. As with previous editions of the Dietary Guidelines, recommended limits pertain to days on which alcohol is consumed.

Added Sugars

As part of its focus on healthy dietary patterns that include nutrient-dense foods consumed at appropriate energy levels, the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommended that Americans consume less than 10 percent of energy from added sugars. The 2020 Committee revisited this topic, with an examination of the relationship between added sugars consumption and risk of CVD. It also examined the impact of added sugars on achieving nutrient recommendations and considered how much added sugars could be accommodated in a healthy dietary pattern. For Americans ages 1 year and older, average consumption of added sugars represent 13 percent of daily energy intake, meaning that most Americans consume diets that exceed current Dietary Guidelines recommendations. Nearly 70 percent of added sugars intake comes from 5 food categories: sweetened beverages, desserts and sweet

snacks, coffee and tea (with their additions), candy and sugars, and breakfast cereals and bars.

Evidence suggests that adverse effects of added sugars, particularly from SSB, may contribute to unhealthy weight gain and obesity-related health outcomes. Reducing the amount of added sugars in the diet, either through changes in consumer behavior or in how food is produced and sold, is an achievable objective that could improve population health. After considering the scientific evidence for the potential health impacts of added sugars intake, along with findings from model-based estimations of energy available in the dietary pattern after meeting nutrient requirements, the Committee suggests that less than 6 percent of energy from added sugars is more consistent with a dietary pattern that is nutritionally adequate while avoiding excess energy intake from added sugars than is a pattern with less than 10 percent energy from added sugars.

Frequency of Eating

Eating is a behavior that provides humans with nutrients for growth, function, and body maintenance. Eating behaviors can support or weaken health and strongly influence the quality and length of life. A person’s daily nutrient intake, and overall nutritional status, are determined by a complex interplay of 3 factors surrounding food choice: type, amount, and frequency. The

(24)

Committee examined national cross-sectional data to learn about the state of eating frequency in the United States and conducted a systematic review of studies to examine the relationships between eating frequency and growth, body size and composition, overweight and obesity, CVD, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality. Although the Committee was unable to find adequate evidence to answer the questions on the relationship between eating frequency and health outcomes, its analysis of eating frequency in the United States revealed a wide variety of eating frequency patterns that varied by socioeconomic and demographic factors. Diet quality was higher when self-reported meal intake increased from 2 meals per day to 3, whereas late- night eating often contained food components recommended to be consumed in moderation.

Despite the importance of this topic, the available evidence for many questions was insufficient to form conclusion statements, highlighting the critical need for additional research.

USDA Food Patterns for Individuals Ages 2 Years and Older

The USDA Food Patterns represent the types and amounts of foods groups and subgroups that aim to provide sufficient nutrients or food components to meet Dietary Reference Intakes and Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations. The Food Patterns are updated every 5 years and are presented to the Committee for its assessment of how well the Patterns align with the most current evidence on diet, health, and nutrient adequacy. The 3 current USDA Food Patterns are the Healthy U.S.-Style Pattern, the Healthy Vegetarian Pattern, and the Healthy Mediterranean-Style Pattern. Based on its review of the evidence, the Committee confirmed that these Food Patterns represent healthy dietary patterns in that they provide the majority of energy from plant-based foods, such as vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts and seeds; provide protein and fats from nutrient-rich food sources; and limit intakes of added sugars, solid fats, and sodium. The Committee noted that the types of foods that

individuals should eat are remarkably consistent and that these Patterns can be applied across life stages, even taking into account specific nutrient needs at particular life stages. Because the risk of chronic disease begins early in life, taking steps to apply the best understanding of

healthy dietary intakes in the earliest days of life can support lifelong chronic disease risk reduction and improved quality of life.

(25)

INTEGRATING THE EVIDENCE

The research the Committee reviewed supports a lifespan approach because it reinforces the importance of implementing dietary patterns that are most associated with nutrition

adequacy, energy balance, and reduced risk of diet-related chronic health conditions. Achieving goals at each life stage not only supports health at that point in time, but also provides a sound basis for transitioning to the next life stage from a position of nutritional advantage. Integrating the evidence reviewed for the topics addressed in this report, the 2020 Committee concludes that every life stage provides an opportunity to make food choices that promote health and well- being, achieve and maintain appropriate weight status, and reduce risk of diet-related chronic disease.

In summarizing the findings of the dietary patterns reviews, the Committee also noted that a powerful aspect of using a dietary patterns approach is that it enables multiple adaptations to fit cultural, personal, and individual needs and preferences in food choices. Though the Committee did not review questions on topics such as the food environment, the overall food system, or strategies to support behavior change, it emphasized the importance of these topics and strongly encourages the Secretaries of USDA and HHS to examine these topics to support improved dietary intake among Americans. The Committee also identified several resource needs for the next Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (such as updates to the Dietary Reference Intakes for macronutrients, for birth to age 24 months, and for pregnancy and lactation), and pointed to the need for additional research on the birth to age 24 months life stage. Finally, the Committee suggested ways to incorporate its major findings into updates of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans overarching principals for achieving an overall healthy dietary pattern.

(26)

PART B. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Since it was first published in 1980, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans has provided science-based advice to promote health, reduce risk of diet-related chronic diseases, and meet nutrient needs. Early editions focused on healthy members of the general public but,

recognizing the growing prevalence of diet-related chronic diseases, such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and some forms of cancer, more recent editions have covered individuals with increased risk of chronic disease as well.

By law (Public Law 101-445, Title III, 7 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) the Dietary Guidelines for Americans is published by the Federal government every 5 years. Since the 1985 edition, the U.S. Departments of Agriculture (USDA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) have fulfilled this requirement by establishing a Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee of nationally

recognized experts in the field of nutrition and health to review the scientific and medical knowledge current at the time. The 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee was

established for the single, time-limited task of examining the evidence on specific nutrition and public health topics and scientific questions and of providing independent, science-based advice and recommendations to the Federal government. This report presents the Committee’s advice to the Secretaries of Agriculture and of Health and Human Services for use as USDA and HHS develop the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

THE ROLE OF DIET IN HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION

In the United States, more than half of all adults have one or more preventable chronic diseases, many of which are related to unhealthy dietary intakes. Unhealthy dietary intakes, tobacco use, and not enough physical activity, among other risk factors, are related to the leading causes of deaths in the United States.

Up-to-date nutrition advice in the Dietary Guidelines can help improve the health of

Americans by encouraging food and beverage choices that are affordable, enjoyable, promote health, and help prevent chronic disease, taking into account that availability and access to nutritious food is important for all Americans, including those who are food insecure. Data from 2018 show that food insecurity and lack of access to affordable healthy food affect more than 37 million people, including 6 million children,

(27)

AN EVOLVING FOCUS FOR DIETARY GUIDANCE

The Federal government has provided dietary advice for the public for more than 100 years.

The earliest focus of dietary guidance was on food groups in a healthy diet, food safety, food storage, and ensuring that people got enough vitamins and minerals to prevent deficiency diseases. As nutrition science evolved, researchers learned that diet also played a role in disease prevention and health promotion, and dietary guidance also evolved to reflect the rapidly growing knowledge base about the relationships between diet and health.

Since 1980, the Dietary Guidelines, and the science on which they have been based, have been remarkably consistent on the majority of components that make up a healthy diet, but they also have evolved in several substantial ways.

Expanding to New Populations

Historically, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans focused on nutrition and food-based recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention for individuals ages 2 years and older. Over the years, however, a growing body of evidence made it increasingly clear that proper nutrition during the earliest stages of life was critical to support healthy growth and development during childhood and help promote health and prevent chronic disease through adulthood, that is, across the lifespan.

In 2012, the USDA and HHS initiated a multi-phase project to generate information that could help the Departments develop dietary recommendations for infants and toddlers.¹ The first phase was completed in 2012-2013. In February 2014, Congress passed the Agricultural Act of 2014, which mandated that, beginning with the 2020-2025 edition, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans expand to include dietary guidance for infants and toddlers (from birth to age 24 months) as well as women who are pregnant. As a result, USDA and HHS adjusted the purpose, timeline, and scope of the project to reflect the addition of pregnant women. The project was tasked with conducting comprehensive systematic reviews on diet and health that are of public health importance for women who are pregnant and infants and toddlers from birth to 24 months of age.

The 2020 Committee has used the evidence generated from this project, in addition to conducting its own systematic reviews, as the foundation for its advice to USDA and HHS on components of a healthy diet for women who are pregnant or lactating and infants and toddlers from birth to age 24 months. USDA and HHS will use this evidence to include, for the first time

(28)

in recent editions, dietary guidance for these populations in the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

Evolving from Nutrients to Dietary Patterns

Previous Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees focused on evidence that looked at the relationships between individual nutrients, foods, and food groups and health outcomes.

Although this science base continues to be substantial, researchers and public health experts began to consider a broader perspective. Science was acknowledging that just as nutrients are not consumed in isolation, foods and beverages are not consumed separately either. Rather, they are consumed in various combinations over time—a dietary pattern.

The evolving evidence showed that components of a dietary pattern could have interactive, synergistic, and potentially cumulative relationships, such that they could predict overall health status and disease risk more fully than could individual foods or nutrients. The 2010 Committee acknowledged the importance of dietary patterns and recommended additional research in this area. The 2015 Committee made dietary patterns a central focus of its evidence review and concluded that a healthy diet could be attained with many dietary patterns adaptable to personal and cultural preferences.

The 2020 Committee continues this same focus with an even deeper examination of the relationships between dietary patterns and specific health outcomes. Future Committees will continue to address the evolving public health concerns and nutrition needs of the U.S. public by examining the latest body of nutrition science.

FROM THE 2020 DIETARY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE DIETARY GUIDELINES FOR AMERICANS

A major goal of the 2020 Committee is to summarize and synthesize the evidence to support USDA and HHS in developing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans—the nutrition recommendations for reducing the risk of chronic disease while meeting nutrient requirements and promoting health for all Americans.

The U.S. Government uses the Dietary Guidelines for Americans as the basis of its food assistance programs, nutrition education efforts, and decisions about national health objectives.

For example, the National School Lunch Program and the Elderly Nutrition Program incorporate the Dietary Guidelines in menu planning, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for

(29)

Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) applies the Dietary Guidelines in its program and educational materials, and the Healthy People objectives for the Nation include objectives based on the Dietary Guidelines.

The Dietary Guidelines also provides a critical framework for state and local health promotion and disease prevention initiatives. In addition, it provides foundational evidence- based nutrition guidance for use by individuals and those who serve them in public and private settings, including health professionals, public health and social service agencies, health care and educational institutions, researchers, and business. The Committee also hopes that the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans will encourage the food industry to grow, manufacture, and sell foods and beverages that promote health and contribute to the U.S.

population consuming the appropriate level of calories while meeting recommendations for food groups, nutrients, and other dietary components.

A GUIDE TO THE 2020 COMMITTEE’S REPORT

This Report contains several major sections. Part A provides an Executive Summary to the Report. Part B sets the stage for the Report through this Introduction. A second chapter in this section provides an integration of major findings.

Part C describes the methodology the Committee used to conduct its work and review the evidence on diet and health. Part D: Evidence on Diet and Health provides the results of the Committee’s review of the evidence, presented in 14 chapters. Part E: Future Directions

includes the Committee’s recommendations on topics for possible consideration by the nutrition and public health community, including its research recommendations.

The Report concludes with a number of Appendices, including a glossary; a summary of the process used to collect public comments; biographical sketches of Committee members; a list of Subcommittee and Working Group members; and Acknowledgments.

REFERENCES

1. Stoody EE, Spahn JM, Casavale KO. The Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project: a series of systematic reviews on diet and health. Am J Clin Nutr. 019;109(Suppl_7):685s- 697s. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy372.

(30)

PART B. CHAPTER 2: INTEGRATING THE EVIDENCE

INTRODUCTION

This chapter provides an overview of the themes that emerged from the 2020 Dietary Guidance Advisory Committee’s examination of the evidence pertaining to the questions addressed. This review and resulting recommendations are provided to the Secretaries of Agriculture (USDA) and of Health and Human Services (HHS) for the development of the 2020- 2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The Committee’s integrated review of the evidence to address the topics and questions in its charge strongly supports a life stage approach in the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans that encompass dietary patterns that provide recommended nutrient intakes in a culturally acceptable manner.

This edition of the Committee’s report is the first to extensively review the period from birth to age 24 months as well as to fully integrate evidence reviewed on pregnancy and lactation.

This will enable USDA and HHS to take a full lifespan approach in its dietary recommendations.

A lifespan approach highlights the importance of implementing dietary patterns that are most associated with nutrition adequacy, energy balance, and reduced risk of diet-related chronic health conditions starting at the earliest life stages. This orientation further emphasizes the importance of adhering to these nutrient-dense dietary patterns throughout each subsequent life stage to meet nutritional needs appropriate to each life stage and to maintain health and well- being. Due to the high prevalence of obesity and obesity-related chronic diseases, this

approach also emphasizes the consumption of foods within dietary patterns that reduce the risk of developing overweight and obesity and the co-morbid conditions associated with them, as well as the specific dietary patterns that are independently associated with the prevalence of chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), osteoporosis,

hypertension and certain types of cancers. As opposed to a focus on weight status at one point in life, the recommended dietary intakes support healthy weight trajectories at each stage of life, including healthy growth and development from infancy through adolescence, appropriate weight gain during pregnancy, energy needs during pregnancy and lactation, weight stability during mid-life, and healthy body composition late in life. The recommended dietary intakes can help prevent excess weight gain at every life stage, and support health even apart from

considerations of energy intake.

(31)

SETTING THE STAGE: THE PUBLIC HEALTH CHALLENGE

Part D. Chapter 1: Current Intakes of Foods, Beverages, and Nutrients of the

Committee’s report illustrates the public health challenge that arises from the high prevalence of chronic diseases that affect the American public, both children and adults, stemming from the dietary patterns that are currently consumed by Americans. Of substantial concern is the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity beginning at younger ages that can be carried into later life stages and worsen in adulthood. These high rates are a driver for diet-related chronic disease risk and are strongly associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, including pregnancy outcomes and initiation and duration of breastfeeding. More than 70 percent of American adults are overweight or obese and the prevalence of severe obesity has increased over the past two decades. The Committee included evidence from studies that included people with overweight and obesity to reflect this reality of our current population.

Additionally, statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicate that 6 in 10 American adults have a chronic disease and 4 in 10 have 2 or more disease conditions.¹ Various factors contribute to the prevalence of chronic disease. Prominent among these are poor nutrition, lack of physical activity, and excessive alcohol use. The consequences of these chronic conditions affect all Americans, given their impact on quality of life, vulnerability to emerging infectious diseases, and the cost burden to society, particularly the health care system.

The 2010 Committee introduced the importance of dietary patterns in understanding the relationship between food choices and risk of chronic diseases. Their review was the catalyst for the Departments’ Dietary Patterns Systematic Review Project,² which informed the 2015

Committee’s review and their recommendation that thinking about diet and health relationships should evolve from food groups and nutrients to dietary patterns. The 2020 Committee has further expanded this approach, using a growing body of evidence. Data from What We Eat in America (WWEIA), the dietary intake component of the National Health and Nutrition

Examination Survey (NHANES), were analyzed to determine the degree to which current American eating patterns are consistent with the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations for reducing risk of chronic health conditions. The 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines³ recommended a healthful eating pattern for ages 2 years and older based on food groups to include as well as food groups and related food components to limit.

The Committee’s comparison of current intakes to these recommendations across various energy levels and life stages indicated that, across all age groups ages 2 years and older, the intake of fruits and vegetables, dairy products, and whole grains is less than recommended and

2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee

2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee

First Print : July 2020

Contents

•

•

DIETARY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND FEDERAL SUPPORT STAFF

2020 DIETARY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

Chair

Vice Chair

Members

FEDERAL SUPPORT STAFF

Co-Executive Secretaries

Lead Administrative Support

Policy Officials

USDA and HHS Federal Liaisons

Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Team

Data Analysis Team

Additional Staff Support

Science Writer/Editor

PART A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CURRENT DIETARY INTAKES THROUGH THE LIFE COURSE

DIET AND HEALTH RELATIONSHIPS: PREGNANCY AND LACTATION

Pregnancy

Lactation

DIET AND HEALTH RELATIONSHIPS: BIRTH TO AGE 24 MONTHS

Exclusive Human Milk and/or Infant Formula Feeding

Complementary Foods and Beverages

Dietary Supplements

USDA Food Patterns for Children Younger than Age 24 Months

DIET AND HEALTH RELATIONSHIPS: INDIVIDUALS AGES 2 YEARS AND OLDER

Dietary Patterns

Dietary Fats and Seafood

Beverages

Alcoholic Beverages

Added Sugars

Frequency of Eating

USDA Food Patterns for Individuals Ages 2 Years and Older

INTEGRATING THE EVIDENCE

PART B. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

THE ROLE OF DIET IN HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION

AN EVOLVING FOCUS FOR DIETARY GUIDANCE

Expanding to New Populations

Evolving from Nutrients to Dietary Patterns

FROM THE 2020 DIETARY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE DIETARY GUIDELINES FOR AMERICANS

A GUIDE TO THE 2020 COMMITTEE’S REPORT

REFERENCES

PART B. CHAPTER 2: INTEGRATING THE EVIDENCE

INTRODUCTION

SETTING THE STAGE: THE PUBLIC HEALTH CHALLENGE