►EOLOGICAL ORIENTATION OF PEASANTS-AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF IMPACT OF MAOISM ON PEASANTS IN
SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT (ANDHRA PRADESH)
By
P. RANGA RAO
A Thesis Submitted
In Fulfilment of The Requirements of the Degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
DEPARTMENT OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DELHI
1985
CERTIFIC474
I an satisfied that the thesis presented by ter. P. Range Rao is worthy of consideration
for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and is a record of the original bonafide research work carried out by him under my guidance and supervision and that the results contained in it have not been submitted in part or full to any other University or Institute for award of any degree/diploma. I certify that he has pursued the prescribed course of
research.
k,,
L. is
Nadir) Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Isla, Delhi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. X.L. Nadir for his constant encouragement and
excellent stimulating guidance throughout the course Of this research work. But for his ability, enthusiasm and keen interest in the work, the completion of this thesis would have been an impossible task. My thanks
are also due to Prof. (Mrs.) PurnimaMathur, Head, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi,. for her generous help during my stay in this department. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. S.N. Jha (now Assistant Professor in Centre for Political Studies, SchoOl of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi) with whom I was associated at the initial stage of my research work. I am grateful to Dr. M.P. Jain, Assistant Professor in English language, for his
invaluable suggestions and advice regarding the language of my thesis.
My thanks are due to the respondents in the field area for spending time with me till late nights to enable me to interview them. My thanks are due to those Maoist leaders who have provided me access to the
rare documents of the party and who have helped in building rapport with the respondents. My thanks are also due to all the officers Who helped me in my data collection.
owe much to my parents and to my elder
brother Shri Pa. Rena Rao, whose unconditional love and support allowed me the freedom to be a researcher.
My thanks are due to my friends and relatives who have always supported me morally and financially
in times of distress and difficulties.
Hy thanks are due to Mr. J.S. Etedi for his painstaking typing of the manuscript neatly.
Lastly, my sincere gratitude to my beloved wife &mammals far her co.operation and inspiration for completing this research work.
iL • i(-°("/)=---
(P. Ranga Rao)
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Delhi*
SPIVERA
INTRODUCTICV 1.1 The Problem 1.2 The OVectives 1.3 Scope of the Study
1.4 Limitations of the Study 1.5 Chapter Plan
PAGE
1-10 1- 6 6- 7 7 7-8 8-10
MIAPTER It
ME CONCEPT 0' IDEOLOGYI ISSUES
RELATED VIM ITS EMPIRIC& STUDY 11-34 2.1 Rd yo as Distortion of 11-13
Reality
2.2 The Concept of Ideology and 13-19 Ideological Mentality
2.3 Ideological liantalitY*ConeePtual
issue* 19-29
2.4 Ideological nentality 2
Methodological lames 30-34
2.3 Conclusion 34
CHAPTER YIZ
DErma PEAS/LITS 35-72 3,1 'Peasantry' as a Valid Concept 35-38
3.2 Flerizts Marx* Daze's, Lenin and 38-44
Flat)
PAGE
3.3
Western Liberal Scholars onPeasants' Wolf, 1:oore, and
Shanin
3,4 Peasant Classes in India
3.5
Peasant Classes, Caste and Feudal Values3.6 Present Scheme of Classifi- cation of Peasantry
CHAPTER IV
IDEOLOGY, PEASANT SOOTY AND CULTURE
4.1 Tho Dominant Ideology 4,2 Social Strain
4.3 Centers of Ideaocical Production 4.4 Peasant Society and Culture
4.5 Ideological Trustees 4.6 Conclusion
45-46 46-64 65-69 69-72
73-95 74-79 79-82 82-85 85-92 92-95 95
CRAPTIII V
MAOISM IN INDIA • VARIOUS SiADES
5.1 The Communist Party of India 5.2 The Communist Party of India
(Marxist)
5.3 The(N Communist Party of India arxisteloninisti
3.4 Maoist Groups
40
Splits96-129 96-100 100.d. 103 103-109 109-114
PAGE
114.-116 116...128 128.-429
5*5 Maoist Groups • Differences 5.6 Operative IdeOlow
of Maas)5.7 Causes for D4iPtcrences mom
Maoists
MAKER VILARCH ' ,Rom= =LOCALE
OF THE STUDY
6.1 Locale of tho Study 6.2 Selection of the Sample 6.3 Selection ofilethod
6.4 Background
Data .0SrikakUlam District
6,5 Respondents
azi taeir Locale6,6 Conclusion
130...159 130.-132 132..134 134 135-148 148...159
159
MAKER VII
PEASANT I Y coM= ADD
STRUCTIRE 160-172
7.1 Salient Issues and Basic
Orientations*
160...162 7.2 On the Prosmt162...166
System
'&3 Govornmental Inatitutions 166...169
7.4 Conclusion
169-172aitPTM VIII
ON IDEOLOGICAL MUST=
8.1
Social Strain.
8.2 Shared EXpariences and
new Bases of Trust173-211 173-183 183-.187
Pi=
187-19 2 19 2- 200 200- 208 208- 210 Breakdown of Traditional
Borri CZ'S
8.4 Peasant notaicntion emd Party Hui'tow)
80 Intensification of Party totivitias
8.6 Setbaelt to eto Party Activities
8,7 Collo'mien 210-211
CHAPTER IX
conzunos
212-216REFERENCES 217-239
APPENDICEZ
Appendix A 240- 255
Apperrax D 256-289