• No results found

Spectrally Tunable, Large Raman

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Spectrally Tunable, Large Raman"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Spectrally Tunable, Large Raman

Enhancement from Nonradiative Energy Transfer in van der Waals Heterostructure

Medha Dandu,

Kenji Watanabe,

Takashi Taniguchi,

Ajay K. Sood,

and Kausik Majumdar

,

†Department of Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India

‡National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, 305-044, Japan

¶Department of Physics,

Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India E-mail: kausikm@iisc.ac.in

(2)

3 6 9 12 0

10 20 30

Thickness (nm)

Distance (mm)

1 2 3

0 3 6 9 12

Thickness (nm)

Distance (mm)

11 nm

11 nm

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

J

1

J

2

Figure S1: Optical images and AFM of samples J1 and J2. (a,b) Optical images of WS2/SnSe2 sample, J1 and MoS2/SnSe2 sample, J2. Dashed lines highlight 1L-TMD (pink) and SnSe2 (green) regions. Scale bar is 5 µm. (c,d) Step height proles of SnSe2 along the white arrows in (a,b) obtained from AFM scans.

1 2 3 4 5 6

0 3 6 9

Thickness (nm)

Distance (m)

0.5 1.0 1.5

0 10 20 30 40

Thickness (nm)

Distance (m) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

0 3 6 9 12

Thickness (nm)

Distance (m)

5.5 nm

8 nm

(b)

40 nm

(a)

(c)

40 nm

Figure S2: Optical images and AFM of MoS2/SnSe2 samples. Optical images of MoS2/SnSe2 samples and corresponding AFM step height proles along the white arrows in optical images depicting the thickness of SnSe2. Scale bar is5 µm.

(3)

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0

3 6 9

Thickness (nm)

Distance (m)

1 2 3 4 5 6

0 10 20 30

Thickness (nm)

Distance (m)

B A B

A

hBN on top

15 nm 9 nm

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0

3 6 9 12

Thickness (nm)

Distance (m) 9.8 nm

1 2 3 4

0 3 6 9

Thickness (nm)

Distance (m) 1 2 3

0 3 6 9 12 15

Thickness (nm)

Distance (m) 9 nm

13.2 nm

B A

A B

(b)

(c)

9 nm

Figure S3: Optical images and AFM of MoS2/hBN/SnSe2 samples. Left panel shows the optical images of MoS2/hBN/SnSe2 samples. Scale bar is 5 µm. Dashed lines highlight the regions of MoS2 (pink), hBN (yellow) and SnSe2 (green) regions. Middle panel shows the corresponding AFM step height proles of hBN along the yellow arrow in optical images. Right panel shows the corresponding AFM step height proles along the white arrow in optical images from which SnSe2 thickness is extracted.

(4)

1 2 3 0

10 20

Thickness (nm)

Distance (mm)

0.5 1.0 1.5

0 3 6 9

Thickness (nm)

Distance (mm) 18 nm

8.5 nm

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Thickness (nm)

Distance (mm) 35nm

25nm

(c) (b) (a)

Figure S4: Optical images and AFM of MoS2/hBN samples. Optical images of MoS2/hBN samples (left panel) with the corresponding AFM step height proles of hBN (right panel) along the yellow arrow in optical images. Scale bar is 5 µm. Region of hBN (MoS2) is marked with yellow (pink) dashed line in optical images.

(5)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0

3 6 9 12 15

0 1 2 3 4

PL intensity ratio Raman intensity ratio

5 10 15

404.5 405.0 405.5 406.0

1L-MoS2/SnSe2

1L-MoS2

A1g peak position (cm-1)

5 10 15

4 5 6

A1g FWHM (cm-1)

5 10 15

405.25 405.50 405.75

A1g peak position (cm-1)

Thickness of SnSe2 (nm)

5 10 15

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

A1g FWHM (cm-1)

Thickness of SnSe2 (nm) 633 nm

633 nm 633 nm

532 nm 532 nm

(d) (e)

5 10 15

384.5 385.0

E1 2g peak position (cm-1)

Thickness of SnSe2 (nm) 532 nm

(f)

Figure S5: Raman characterization from MoS2/SnSe2 samples. (a,b) MoS2 A1g peak position and FWHM with 633 nm excitation from isolated (blue) and junction (green) regions. (c) PL intensity ratio versus Raman intensity ratio across dierent MoS2/SnSe2 samples under 633 nm excitation emphasizing contribution of NRET and dierence in their enhancement factors. (d,e) Peak position and FWHM of MoS2 A1g with532 nm excitation.

(f) MoS2 E2g1 peak position from isolated and junction regions from532 nm Raman spectra.

1.8 2.0 2.2

R/R of SnSe

2

Energy (eV) 12 nm SnSe2 at 4 K

Figure S6: Dierential reectance spectroscopy on SnSe2. Broad ∆RR spectra of12 nm SnSe2 from dierential reectance spectroscopy at 4K.

(6)

1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 Energy (eV)

1.83702 1.9291 2.03255 2.14939 273

313 353 393 433

Energy (eV)

Temperature (K)

0.000 0.2500 0.5000 0.7500 1.000

250 300 350 400 450 -0.4

-0.3 -0.2 -0.1

DR/R minima

Temperature (K)

250 300 350 400 450 1.94

1.96 1.98 2.00 2.02

2.04 DR/R minima

532 nm PL

A1s peak position (eV)

Temperature (K)

243 K 453 K

(a) (b) (c)

(d)

Figure S7: Temperature dependent Dierential reectance spectroscopy on WS2 in sample J1. (a)∆RR spectra from isolated WS2at dierent temperatures from243K to453 K which represent shift ofA1sexciton peak. (b) Temperature versusA1speak energy contour plot from WS2 ∆RR spectra where blue region depicts the ∆RR minima. (c)A1s peak position as a function of temperature extracted from ∆RR minima and 532nm PL. (d) Strength of ∆RR minima as a function of temperature which shows relative similar oscillator strength of WS2

from243 K to 453 K.

(7)

250 300 350 400 450 5

6 7 8 9

WS2/SnSe2 WS2

A1g Total FWHM (cm-1)

Temperature(K)

250 300 350 400 450 416

417 418 419 420

421 WS WS2/SnSe2

2

A1g peak position (cm-1)

Temperature(K)

250 300 350 400 450 0

1 2 3

PL Intensity Ratio at 1.9426 eV

Temperature(K)

250 300 350 400 450 0.00

0.25 0.50 0.75

1.00 WS2/SnSe2

Normalized PL Intensity at 1.96 eV

Temperature(K) 633 nm

250 300 350 400 450 5

10 15 WS2 X

WS2 T

PL intensity (x103 counts)

Temperature(K) 250 300 350 400 450 25

30 35 40 45

50 WS2 532 nm A1s peak Linear fit

Total FWHM (meV)

Temperature (K)

532 nm

532 nm

(d) (e) (f)

Figure S8: Temperature dependent Raman and PL characterization of WS2/SnSe2 sample, J1. (a,b) Temperature versus WS2 A1g FWHM and position on isolated (blue) and junction (green) regions from 633 nm excitation. (c) FWHM of WS2 A1s exciton as a function of temperature and the corresponding linear t. (d) 633 nm PL intensity ratio (at 1.9426 eV) of WS2/SnSe2 which exhibits modulation with temperature similar to ηN RET discussed in the main text. (e) Normalized532 nm PL intensity at 1.96 eV exhibiting maximum at the temperature close to 633 nm excitation resonance. (f) Exciton (X) and Trion (T) peak intensities as a function of temperature with 532 nm excitation.

1.94 1.96 1.98 2.00 2.02 2.04 1

2 3 4 J1

J3

Raman intensity Ratio

Exciton peak position (eV) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

0 3 6 9 12

Thickness (nm)

Distance (mm) 10.5 nm

J3

(a) (b) (c)

Figure S9: Raman enhancement characteristics of another WS2/SnSe2 sample, J3. (a) Optical image of J3 with WS2 and SnSe2 marked by pink and green dashed lines respectively. Scale bar is5µm. (b) SnSe2 thickness prole from AFM along the white arrow in (a). (c) 633 nm WS2 Raman intensity ratio as a function of exciton peak position from

(8)

1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.10 Energy (eV)

1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.10 Energy (eV)

1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.10 Energy (eV)

1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.10 Energy (eV)

T = 293 K

T = 423 K

T = 453 K

T

T

T

X

X

X

1.96 eV

T X

T = 243 K

Figure S10: Temperature dependent PL spectra of isolated WS2 from WS2/SnSe2 sample, J1. PL spectra obtained from 532 nm excitation of isolated WS2

at four dierent temperatures with corresponding tting of exciton (X) and trion (T) peaks.

References

Related documents

Step 0  Create a database with images and their details; Step 1  Start from the first image of database and proceed step 2 until last image is arrived; Step 2  Find

Supplementary figure S5d shows a topographic AFM image of PbFCl exfoliated in NMP along with the height profile (supplementary figure S5e) showing *4–8 layers and a thickness of

The TiO 2 /spathodea shows better charge transfer resistance as compared to TiO 2 /salvia combination, and this result is consistent with optical absorption results, resulting in

E 2 (high) optical phonon mode of GaN was observed, proving the hexagonal structure of the thin film. The residual stress in the GaN thin films was calculated from Raman

Figure 5 shows TEM images and SAED patterns of the nanocrystals obtained by pyrolysis of precursors (1) and (2), whereas supplementary figures S9 and S10 show TEM images and

SURF feature extraction from test images is the first step in annotation phase. In second step classify each test images using Fuzzy K-NN algorithm based on the model created in

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a document image analysis method that involves the mechanical or electronic transformation of scanned or photographed images

Up till now we have studied the role of various MOS parameters like germanium concentration (X), body doping concentration (N A ), strained silicon thickness (t Si ), oxide