• No results found

Key Indicator - 1.4 Feedback System (20)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share " Key Indicator - 1.4 Feedback System (20) "

Copied!
70
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Key Indicator - 1.4 Feedback System (20)

6 1.4.1 Structured feedback for design and review of syllabus – semester wise / year wise is received from 1) Students, 2) Teachers, 3) Employers, 4) Alumni 5) Parents for design and review of syllabus

Semester wise /year wise Options:

A. Any 4 of above B. Any 3 of above C. Any 2 of above D. Any 1 of above

E. None of the above (10)

1.4.2 Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows: (10) A. Feedback collected, analysed and action taken and feedback available on website B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken

C. Feedback collected and analysed D. Feedback collected

E. Feedback not collected

URL for feedback collection and analysis reports

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)

Scanned with CamScanner

(68)

Scanned with CamScanner

(69)

Scanned with CamScanner

(70)

Scanned with CamScanner

References

Related documents

Sensory feedback fingers Mechanical gripper with sensory feedback capabilities in the fingers; aid in locating the work-part and determining correct grip force to be

3.7.1.1: Total number of Collaborative activities with other institutions/ research establishment/industry for research and academic development of faculty and students year

The output of the preamplifier circuit is given to the back to back invertors which act as a positive feedback circuit and amplifies the feedback signal to achieve a

A state feedback controller is used and along with it, a predictive control scheme is implemented to design variable gains of the feedback controller depending on the number

Golaka C.Nath and G.P.Samanta (2003)4' has used Granger causality test in Vector Auto Regression framework and Geweke's feedback measures on daily data of the exchange rate of

ALGORITHM FOR RELEVANCE FEEDBACK The simultaneous relevant feature identification and classifi- cation are applied to the relevance feedback scenario as fol- lows: The

  The experienced cognitive load in haptic feedback case is not significantly different from nofeedback and visual feedback cases.. Six pairwise ttests

J t is well known that an amplifier having a feedback path between the output and the input is liable to produce self-oscillations when the feedback is positive and